| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

13 Sept 2003 Eva Mendes vs Naomi Watts

Page history last edited by Archer844 14 years, 10 months ago

(PARTIAL REPORT)

 

(Originally posted by Simguy 9/13/2003, 8:34 am)

Watts in white satin drawstring pajama pants, white bikini top

Mendes in white satin drawstring pajama pants, white push up.

Sydney, Australia

UD10 Mendes

 

Looking to get their girl some rounds away from prying US media eyes - Mendes' handlers took a Watts bout in Australia in hopes of erasing the memory of the Aniston shellacking. What they got was a good stout test, with Naomi proving unexpectedly stubborn, and Eva returning to form to gut out the win.

The first three rounds saw Naomi take the lead off a sharp left jab, constant lateral movement and uncanny timing. Light punching Watts would take Mendes off her feet with a cute little step-in hook in the second - just catching Eva posing and dropping her with placement and precision. Eva bounced immediately up, eyes blazing - but it would take her until the fourth to really get into this fight.

 

Despite dropping the first three rounds, Mendes never got discouraged. Watts' slashing hooks were landing and the girls were jabbing each other to a standstill - but Eva's punches carried more weight and seemed to decide the exchanges. Naomi bought herself breathing room by going to Eva's jet-propelled jugs with nasty side to side shoe-shines - backing the latina off with a hurting glare - but Eva could not be denied. Round after round, Mendes walked her girl down, put punches together and by the 8th, was routinely staggering and hurting her girl along the ropes. By the finish, it was Watts bravely holding on to go the route as Mendes would clean up on her girl 7 rounds to 3.

 

Reposted by Archer 6/9/09.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.